Mrs Pretty wanted her husband to end her life without being prosecuted for aiding and abetting suicide. Law is enforced by the ruling bodies of a country; state or a community while there is no such a significant body to enforce moral codes; however, they are followed by those that are taught by the religious teachings and social ethics. The main difference between law and morality is that law refers to the set of rules and regulations enforced by the state to regulate the human behaviour in society whereas morality refers to the ethical code of conduct for a human being. Morality refers to the social principles that define what is morally right and morally wrong. If the case had been successful it would have effectively struck down the legal ban on assisted suicide and legalised euthanasia. Promotion runs from 00:01am to 11:59pm (GMT/UTC) on the 30th November 2020. They argue that her wish is her own choice and violates no one else and is in everyone’s best interest. Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a law student. The Pretty case kept the euthanasia debate in the public domain and on 13 May 2006 after previous attempts to introduce a private member’s bill, the Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill, the House of Lords finally defeated it. 2. In brief, it is the ethical code of conduct of a person. Moreover, punishments are enforced by law for the violation of them whereas there is no such enforcement of punishments in morality for committing immoral acts. Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! The final theory is the most modern and is the Paternalistic view, harm to self and others view as put forward by Professor Hart in the 1960s.fn 7 His theory is that the law should only intervene in the private lives of citizens to prevent harm to others and harm to oneself. Fn 12 The right to total personal autonomy is a cornerstone of the pro-euthanasia camp, but from the point of view of opponents, there is a fundamental problem with this approach. Euthanasia is not the answer. To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on the website then please: Our academic writing and marking services can help you! It is interesting to note that only one of the theories and the oldest one at that supports the legalisation of euthanasia. Hence, social concepts such as ethics, religious teachings, etc. These are created by the state and its institutions. That has always been the aim and that remains the aim now. For that to happen the law would have to be changed from one that protected everyone’s life absolutely to one that left vulnerable people unprotected. This shows how the law and morality are intertwined in this instance but that the Court’s function is not to interpret the law as they might wish it to be (assuming any of their Lordships agreed with euthanasia) to reflect their moral stances but that the law must be interpreted as laid down by UK law and in conjunction with European law. Mill believed that the law should not be used to enforce moral principles on society but to protect harm to its citizens. “A sailor is stripped to the waist, tied to a ladder and bein Wellcome V0041675” By Welcome Images (CC BY 4.0) via Commons Wikimedia3. However the notion that the sanctity of life should be preserved is still an ideal held by many who insist on prolonging life at all costs. Upen, BA (Honours) in Languages and Linguistics, has academic experiences and knowledge on international relations and politics.